曾有在開飯喇提對松屋餐後之感想。最後我得悉編輯是有權選擇刊或否，有一群人的言論被沒殺，相信好多真實的言論就此被掉走，如此傳媒操守，十分可悲可憤可怒啊

唔知有無人和我一樣呢,成篇文章比人唔登,兼沒有任何理由,我問及其他同事和朋友全部都有同感,佢地話之前寫過佢,一d回覆都無,佢地話寫得好辛苦,有點不甘心,編輯鐘意登就登,唔登就唔登,呃殺晒所有人的心血,有點兒那過呢,我今次寫食評就因為我覺得這間餐還不錯,價錢公道,服務態度良好,食多野都無黑面,係我食咁多間日本放題之中最好的,所以我才會寫!其實我都唔知有幾多人和我一樣得到這樣的待遇,希望此傳媒好好地向公眾交代唔好黑箱作業...好的自然有人讚

我想問究竟d編輯睇食評要睇幾多日架,作為一間咁大的網絡公司,編輯做事的工作效率真係直得讚揚啦,拖十日八日都無回覆,如果到時真係寫完好耐先登出來,好多野都過氣啦,你話係咪呢,我都好想知呢到究竟有幾多人好似我,係受害者呢,大家不如發表吓有無人和我一樣 有同感呢

MongMongLeung:

It doesn't sound fair for you to assume that the editors have exercised their preferences into interfering the publishing of certain reviews, regardless of good, bad, or neutral responses. I mean, you've taken the time to write a review (or reviews) and you didn't get published. What I would do, if I were you, is to email to the editor back to ask why not. (and the editors will always email you back with some responses...no matter how "business tone" that may sound)...and that wouldn't be enough. So you would either rewrite to change your style, or change the language you use (maybe you were being too complimenting that sounds like 馬評 or too mean that sounds like you're badmouthing!)...Then if that doesn't work either. You could call them and DEMAND what's going on.  You review not being published could be "overlooked" by the editors, could be a number of reasons -- maybe the number of reviews have skyrocketed overnight, maybe there were too many "too similar" reviews published in one day, or maybe a whole lot of different reasons as well.

Anyways, I think that what you can do is to ring them up and see what happens, you did save a copy of your review, no? If you're dissatisfied over this, and suspected it's the content that the editors are not approving, then feel free to post it up here at the forum and see what others think.

I wish you good luck, really, in posting other reviews in the future. In the meantime, consider it a practice of delayed gratification?!

Foodiewil

The above guy:

Really, there's no need to pretend to sound neutral - Obviously you are protecting Openrice and appreantly the poster's comment disgusted u. You may say there's no reason for u to do that but u really do.

MONGMONGLEUNG 兄, 見閣下冇寫開食評既習慣, 其實松屋有咩令到你咁有興趣寫第一篇食評既?

引用:

原帖由 jackyleung37 於 2009-10-10 01:24 發表
MONGMONGLEUNG 兄, 見閣下冇寫開食評既習慣, 其實松屋有咩令到你咁有興趣寫第一篇食評既?

樓下又有一個 TOPIC 係話松屋的
http://forum.openrice.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=2309&extra=page%3D1

內容都係話寫左松屋食評唔批...好多朋友寫左都唔批...

或者而家興開新 A/C 寫食評
http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/userinfo.htm?userid=192137
http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/userinfo.htm?userid=157294
可能佢地就係上文所指既「朋友」喇，但兩位都「未曾寫過食評」喎
証明松屋真係好多人客食完餐飯會立即上 OPENRICE 開個"新 A/C 寫個笑面"出黎
哈，唔知 "新 A/C 寫個笑面" 同 "松屋" 究竟有咩關係呢?

引用:

原帖由 MONGMONGLEUNG 於 2009-10-9 19:25 發表
唔知有無人和我一樣呢,成篇文章比人唔登,兼沒有任何理由,我問及其他同事和朋友全部都有同感,佢地話之前寫過佢,一d回覆都無,佢地話寫得好辛苦,有點不甘心,編輯鐘意登就登,唔登就唔登,呃殺晒所有人的心血,有點兒那過呢 ...

同意上述觀點, 編輯鐘意登就登,唔登就唔登,呃殺晒所有人的心血,有點兒那過呢,

同意mongmongleung既講法!
我係松屋熟客;  我覺得編輯唔應該鐘意登就登唔中意就唔登;!!
咁姐係抹殺左所有人打既心血;!!!!
編輯唔應該見個個冇打過食評同係新人就覺得係有人做馬;!!!!
編輯唔應該咁做;希望編輯可以快d比個交代我地!!!!!!!!!


ps; 一間餐廳好食; 就自然會多人讚!多人去!多人評good! 唔應該抹殺好既食評!!!!

[ 本帖最後由 通粉B 於 2009-10-10 14:43 編輯 ]

不過咁多網友覺得呢間野唔妥喎...........
如果間間好似你地咁一群熟客一群係咁做咪大鑊

真係咁多熟客
不如好似夾花籃落廣告送松屋啦
攪到人地舖好似咁多疑似馬評抽呢個食評網水咁
分分鐘陷松屋於不義tim

到時愛佢反而害左佢呀

my comments is:
為了慶祝國慶和中秋節,所以決定到松屋一試好彩沒有大失所望,
去過多間放題,依間實在係超值,因為我食5:30時段,每人$138+10%,
羊架多汁嫩滑入味, 燒雞翼超正 燒蝦不腥好味
天婦羅仲正夠熱 芝麻雞翼好味到爆
焗蠔芝士味香濃蠔很大隻,一流!
包埋飲品,beer 和雪糕,平時去其他放題飲野都要成20元杯,
仲有重點值得一讚D侍應服務態度好好,不會因為我食得多而黑面,收碟又快,又不會漏單,我成班朋友已約定下兩星期再來食,同埋食物有水準...and the price is ok,
so i agreed with  通粉B comments,

ps; 一間餐廳好食; 就自然會多人讚!多人去!多人評good! 唔應該抹殺好既食評!!!!

然而我這次故事當時我們成班人去松屋感覺令人滿意,所以寫一個松屋的食評推介松屋
so i just  first time to write a 食評讚松屋

但我D朋友傳說九月許多的客人在openrice寫食評沒有反應,沒有又沒有回信
結果我寫松屋的食評,確實沒reply

i just wonder it

好食 就自然會多人去!多人評good!
i also recommend by my friend and colleagues..............(those dont believe, better to try once)

真係令人失笑

支持松屋  我真係覺得松屋好食!
根本唔係做馬;  真係好食就會多人支持!!
如果真係唔好食;;  點做馬先?!!!
真係唔好食既話;`  都冇人支持喇! 係咪先?!
你地諗野實在太主觀喇;!!!!!!

多謝MONGMONGLEUNG agreed ;)

[ 本帖最後由 通粉B 於 2009-10-10 17:00 編輯 ]

]講真!我有冇必要為咗松屋而造馬呀 好心d人用下個腦啦!!如果唔好食o既話，你貼錢請我去食我都唔會去啦 試問有邊間可以做到$133依個價呀!仲要係好食喎..大吉14幾都唔好食啦,佢間d刺身又冇味又唔新鮮.. 食到我想嘔 如果d人唔信咪自己去試下囉!!唔好淨係識得話人做馬

http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/userinfo.htm?userid=192137
http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/userinfo.htm?userid=157294
http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/userinfo.htm?userid=155259
http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/userinfo.htm?userid=103762

引用:

原帖由 搵食能手 於 2009-10-10 18:25 發表
http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/userinfo.htm?userid=192137
http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/userinfo.htm?userid=157294
http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/userinfo.htm?userid=155259
http://www.ope ...

岩岩睇左松屋d食評...唔係咁識睇係馬評....-0-
有冇c hing教路點識別??
如果個d真係馬評...真係打開本馬經都冇咁多...@@

我都係咁話
公道自在人心

不過話時話...得1個食評個d人有少少怪....開新acc寫既都係好評...就係見唔到開新acc寫劣評...
唔通係openrice開acc寫好評會有獎勵? (or only松屋有咁既promotion?)

新手上路..請指點迷律....

南瓜呀南瓜：
一波未平，一波又起
世風日下
管你們有三頭六臂，都抵擋不了

d人都戇**既,老奉要同你登既咩?
唔x鍾意咪過主羅.
我都好唔x妥佢d編輯格.所以而家咪唔x寫.
我而家寫都係為左換戲票架咋.

松屋有好多食評應該係造假

引用:

原帖由 MONGMONGLEUNG 於 2009-10-14 10:41 發表
我都係咁話
公道自在人心

係呀, 公道自在人心, 睇完松屋d咁"真誠"既食評, 真係連破地獄都唔想去 - 有d咁既"熟客", 連呢d錢都唔想俾佢地賺囉

引用:

原帖由 太公 於 2009-10-19 22:42 發表


係呀, 公道自在人心, 睇完松屋d咁"真誠"既食評, 真係連破地獄都唔想去 - 有d咁既"熟客", 連呢d錢都唔想俾佢地賺囉

太公，你去睇下我民聲食評 d 留言，有人鬼拍後尾枕...內容精彩，不容錯過

引用:

原帖由 搵食能手 於 2009-10-19 22:47 發表

太公，你去睇下我民聲食評 d 留言，有人鬼拍後尾枕...內容精彩，不容錯過

=========================================================
萬圣+重陽效應：真的太..太..太精彩了
=========================================================

引用:

原帖由 shapeshifer 於 2009-10-14 22:10 發表
d人都戇**既,老奉要同你登既咩?
唔x鍾意咪過主羅.
我都好唔x妥佢d編輯格.所以而家咪唔x寫.
我而家寫都係為左換戲票架咋.

========================
肥BB：換到戲票未
========================

看過搵食兄與"熟客"們(如果真是"們"的話)的對話後, 終於明白何解他"們"有如此大的反應了.
照其說法, 也許佢地真係真金白銀俾錢幫襯的
不過因為在公關"鼓勵"和拜托下, 才勉為其難幫手按松屋提供的"食物資料正確寫法"post食評
所以結論是他們不是收錢的寫手,也不是松屋的人
因為：這是種票

電盈私有化果陣都話種票唔係錯, 不過法庭唔係咁睇喎

OR 的存在意義是食客自發與人分享飲食經歷.  如果食評並非出自食客的親身感受, 更是由食肆主動鼓動食客提交的話, 請問與鱔稿的分別有幾大??  

看過樓上"大家對餐廳 / 店方在討論區開 post 宣傳的看法？"投票的公關們, 還不明白這種做法的結果, 只會是反宣傳麼?

　　我三日前都寫咗篇松屋的食評，不過三日過去了，到E+都冇比到我回復同埋意見，我個心都好唔舒服，之前都發表咗對肥姐小食唧意見（食物上有烏蠅）不過有同我講，內容入面有D問題，唔可以采納，當時非常之失望，唔同只可以寫正面唧評語，唔接受意見同埋建議咩？當時我真的想放棄，以后都唔想系度寫食評，不過后來遇到真的很好味唧餐廳，同埋想推薦比大家，冇計又繼續系度留下足跡。　
　　但呢次我真的系絕望了，我真系估唔到甘大個網站竟然都搞呢D嘢，甘好唔公平，同埋都失去咗佢個意義，我真的想知道，我果篇文章有咩問題！

星期三食完，星期四晚寫，我都係未批

松屋版面就事件已經出左通告

"由9月起本網收到近100位非會員或新註冊會員對此餐廳的食評，情況並不尋常，
故本網決定暫停刊登所有關於此餐廳的任何食評，以便進一步調查。
而所有未刊登的食評均會暫存於本網的系統內，不便之處，敬請原諒。

OpenRice啟
2009年10月22日"